
The tools and techniques behind Iran’s push in the battle of narratives.

26 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
26 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

I’ve covered Trump for a decade. At the White House correspondents’ dinner, darkness came viscerally close
Shocking. Unnerving. Unpredictable. Violent. For a decade I have been following the twists and turns of Donald Trump’s America with the privilege of journalistic distance. On Saturday night I felt the darkness come viscerally close.
Bang! Bang! What was that? Where was it? At 8.36pm panic and pandemonium reigned in the cavernous ballroom at the Washington Hilton hotel. There were men running and cries of “Get down!” and “Stay down!”
I saw guests at the White House Correspondents’ Association’s (WHCA) annual dinner – men in tuxedos, women in dresses – diving under the circular tables and I, almost as if acting on a cue, did likewise. It was a scene from a dozen Hollywood movies but now it was happening to me, right here, right now.
Aquí los dos párrafos que me han interesado más del artículo:
Peter Doocy of Fox News asked why this keeps happening to Trump. The president cited Abraham Lincoln and said: “I’ve studied assassinations, and I must tell you, the most impactful people … the people that do the most, the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.”
Which was not the real story. The past 10 years have witnessed a shooting at a congressional baseball practice, a deadly white supremacist march in Charlottesville, the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol and the killings of the former Minnesota house speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and the rightwing activist Charlie Kirk. Political violence is rampant and on Saturday, in a fancy Washington ballroom, Trump and the media glimpsed the edge of the abyss.
Related
What we know about gunfire at White House correspondents’ dinner (BBC)
In his alleged manifesto, Cole Allen, the man accused of targeting the White House correspondents’ dinner, called himself a “Friendly Federal Assassin” and created a list of targets for the shooting, formatted from highest to lowest priority, with Trump administration officials at the top, according to a report from the New York Post.
The manifesto, obtained by the Post, begins with apologies to those who knew the suspect and lists his motives for the shooting. It said the shooter targeted administration officials with the exception of FBI director Kash Patel.
“I am a citizen of the United States of America,” it said. “What my representatives do reflects on me. And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.”
The Guardian 19.06 CEST
25 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
24 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

24 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

US President Donald Trump said Wednesday that there was «no time frame” for ending the war with Iran, stressing that his administration wants a “good deal for the American people.” But with distrust deepening and the Iranian regime still in place, is a deal still possible?
«The fact that the vice president of the United States is leading a delegation to negotiate with Iran is not a small thing,» Ariane Tabatabai, Council senior fellow and vice president of research on security and defense, said of the prospects for an agreement. At the same time, US «policy remains confused and the messaging confusing, which doesn’t lend itself particularly well when you’re trying to negotiate with an adversary.»
24 abril, 2026
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

El mundo actual suele describirse como una sucesión de crisis o un espacio en transición. Pero, más allá de los acontecimientos, lo que define este momento es algo más profundo: la ausencia de un relato compartido. No hay una única forma de interpretar el orden internacional, ni consenso sobre sus reglas o su dirección.
Desde Pekín hasta Washington, pasando por Moscú, Bruselas o las capitales del Sur Global, cada tradición intelectual proyecta una lectura propia de la realidad internacional. Algunas enfatizan el poder y la historia; otras, las normas, la identidad o la autonomía. Esta diversidad no solo refleja intereses distintos, sino también experiencias históricas y concepciones contrapuestas sobre cómo explicar el pasado y organizar el presente.