Relaciones Internacionales – Comunicación Internacional

28 febrero, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Synonyms for catastrophe

Continue leyendo →

28 febrero, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Gaza’s humanitarian catastrophe (C. Amanpour interviews @UNLazzarini)

 

28 febrero, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Hostage Diplomacy as an International Security Threat (Wilson Center)

The arbitrary arrest, detention, or sentencing of foreign nationals by a state to exercise leverage over a foreign government is an emerging but increasingly serious issue that requires international attention. Also known as “hostage diplomacy,” arbitrary detention used for diplomatic leverage exposes all persons who travel, work, and live abroad to risk and undermines the basic principles of international relations, including mutual trust and peaceful settlement of disputes between states. It also contravenes international law, threatens state sovereignty, and destabilizes the rules-based international order.

….MORE

 

26 febrero, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

2024 GLOBAL DIPLOMACY INDEX

 
Lowy Institute

China and the United States lead the world, by some margin, in the size of their diplomatic networks. Beijing tops the Index with 274 posts in its global network, followed closely by Washington with 271.

China’s rise to the top spot was rapid. In 2011, Beijing lagged behind Washington by 23 diplomatic posts. By 2019, China had surpassed the United States in having the world’s largest diplomatic network. In 2021, China pulled further ahead, leading the United States by eight posts, but by 2023, the gap narrowed again to China ahead by just three posts.

Since China assumed the lead, both countries have largely plateaued, with China down two posts overall compared to 2019 (276), and the United States fluctuating slightly to return to 2016 levels (271). This is, perhaps, to be expected. Once diplomatic networks have reached a critical mass, options for new openings reduce to second and third-tier cities, or to countries that are seen as more peripheral and often with riskier operating environments.

In that respect, it is revealing to examine the relative regional emphases of Chinese and American diplomacy to date. China has a larger diplomatic footprint than the United States in Africa (60:56), East Asia* (44:27), the Pacific Islands countries** (9:8), and Central Asia (7:6) after the United States withdrew from Afghanistan.

The United States still leads China diplomatically in Europe (78:73), North and Central America*** (40:24), and South Asia (12:10). Both countries have an equal number of posts in the Middle East (17) and South America (15).

…MORE

KEY FINDINGS

DOWNLOAD REPORT

Related

China’s Reach Is Far And Wide, Tops US On Global Diplomacy Index (Eurasia Review)

 

25 febrero, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Fareed’s Global Briefing (Feb 23. 2024)

Image

Insights, analysis and must reads from CNN’s Fareed Zakaria and the Global Public Square team, compiled by Global Briefing editor Chris Good

Seeing this newsletter as a forward? Sign up here.

February 23, 2024

Fareed: Conflict Is the New Normal

“Looking at the crises proliferating around the world, it is clear that we are in an age of geopolitical tension that resembles the Cold War—a time of constant, continual threats to international order,” Fareed writes for CNN Opinion. “But this time, the West is treating each of these threats as one-offs to be dealt with separately in the hope that normalcy will soon return. But conflict is the new normal.”

Ukraine is struggling in its war against Russia’s invading army, Israel is waging a devastating war in Gaza in retaliation for Hamas’ horrific Oct. 7 massacres, and another conflict simmers with Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border. Given all that, Fareed writes, it’s lamentable that the West hasn’t put itself on better footing.

Europe needs a better military-industrial base to meet the challenge from Russia, Fareed writes, and in the US, “congressional Republicans have decided to return to isolationism, hoping that they can bury their heads in the sand and the problems will somehow go away. It should be noted that contrary to popular belief, ostriches do not bury their heads in the sand to escape threats. In fact, it would lead to their asphyxiation. Maybe the birds understand something congressional Republicans don’t.” Continue leyendo →