@jpmarthoz –Should the media in its quantitative coverage reflect better the way we die? #Terrorism-related deaths = 0,01 of cases but 35% of @nytimes coverage of deaths. An interesting reflection on what makes news.

8 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
@jpmarthoz –Should the media in its quantitative coverage reflect better the way we die? #Terrorism-related deaths = 0,01 of cases but 35% of @nytimes coverage of deaths. An interesting reflection on what makes news.
7 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
6 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

6 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
6 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
5 julio, 2019
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Russia is engaged in a determined assault on Western democracies and their institutions. At its core, this is an attack on public trust and confidence. While policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic have made important strides to combat Russian disinformation operations as they pertain to election security, little has been done to acknowledge and adequately address the threats against justice systems.
Traditionally a democracy’s judiciary is among the most trusted institution in the government. Because of this, it might seem like an unlikely target for disinformation campaigns by a foreign power. However, the judiciary is also, like elections, entirely dependent upon public acceptance of the legitimacy of its outcomes. The idea of a system built on the rule of law and justice delivered by a fair and impartial judiciary is a critical pillar of democracy and one of its greatest strengths. Erode the public’s belief in that idea, and the pillar begins to crumble.