Las voces silenciadas de las mujeres en Afganistán
22 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

22 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
21 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
The proportion of the world engulfed by conflict has grown 65% – equivalent to nearly double the size of India – over the past three years, according to a new report.
Ukraine, Myanmar, the Middle East and a “conflict corridor” around Africa’s Sahel region have seen wars and unrest spread and intensify since 2021, according to the latest Conflict Intensity Index (CII), published by risk analysts Verisk Maplecroft.
While there was a lull in the levels of conflict globally during the Covid-19 pandemic, experts say there has been a rising trend of violence for at least a decade, while many longstanding crises continue unabated.
Hugo Brennan, research director at Verisk Maplecroft, said recent conflicts have had far-reaching impacts on businesses, economic growth and food security, with supply chains disturbed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which endangered grain exports to the Middle East and Africa, and attacks by Houthi rebels from Yemen on Red Sea shipping.
“Conflict risks are increasing, they have for the last few years and global businesses need to think about that. You can look at international media and think: ‘I don’t have a factory in Sudan, it does not affect me,’ but because of the supply chain impacts, a conflict in a faraway place can impact you,” he said.
Wars have spread and intensified, with far-reaching impacts on global economic growth and food security, according to latest Conflict Intensity Index
Related
Global conflict zones grow by two thirds since 2021, topping 6 million km2 (Report)
Conflict zones grow by two thirds globally since 2021, covering 6 million km²
The Global Conflict Risk Index and EU conflict Early Warning (EU)
21 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios
20 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

G20 Rio declaration emphasises resource mobilisation but ignores corruption, risks exacerbating inequality and poverty
19 November 2024, Rio de Janeiro – In the Rio Summit declaration released on Monday night, G20 leaders appear to have found common ground on multiple critical problems, from progressive taxation to measures to alleviate poverty and promote peace. However, Transparency International warns that without addressing corruption and dirty money, agreements made at summits like these will remain only aspirational. This is all the more likely given the growing influence of powerful interest groups and the continued erosion of democratic norms, which pose additional barriers to effective multilateral action. Continue leyendo →
20 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

IT SEEMS APPROPRIATE that 2025 has been designated the year of quantum science and technology by the United Nations. Because like Schrödinger’s cat, which (in a quantum thought-experiment) was both alive and dead at the same time inside a closed box, 2025 has hovered in a superposition of two very different states, defined by the outcome of America’s election. Now the ballot boxes have been opened, the world knows which 2025 to expect: the one where Donald Trump returns to the White House. With that uncertainty resolved, here are ten themes to watch in the coming year.
1. America’s choice.
The repercussions of Mr Trump’s sweeping victory will affect everything from immigration and defence to economics and trade. His “America First” policy will have friends and foes alike questioning the solidity of America’s alliances. This could lead to geopolitical realignments, heightened tensions and even nuclear proliferation. Continue leyendo →
20 noviembre, 2024
por Felipe Sahagún
Sin comentarios

Surprise occurs in many forms. Many think of it in terms of a surprise attack, but it occurs in other dimensions. The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 is a good example: the attack was foreseen, but the immediate outcomes were astonishing. To use an old Soviet phrase, analysts misunderstood in fundamental ways the “correlation of forces.” Their judgments about Russian and Ukrainian military capacity were not merely off—they were wildly at variance with reality. And even more perplexing, leading and widely acknowledged experts misjudged with a degree of certainty that in retrospect is no less remarkable than the analytic failure itself.
Related
Could Russia’s loosened nuclear doctrine lead to a test detonation? (AJE)